Opinion
3:23-cv-00027-ART-CSD
07-11-2023
WILLIAM HEINSELMAN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GIBSON CONTRACTOR LLC, Defendant. DAVID GIBSON CONTRACTOR LLC, Counter-Claimant, v. WILLIAM HEINSELMAN, Counter-Defendant.
HOLLAND & HART LLP Lars K. Evensen Nevada Bar No. 8061 Dirk W. Gaspar Nevada Bar No. 10046 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant GERBER LAW OFFICES, LLP Travis W. Gerber, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8038 Zachary A. Gerber, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13128 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant
HOLLAND & HART LLP Lars K. Evensen Nevada Bar No. 8061 Dirk W. Gaspar Nevada Bar No. 10046 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
GERBER LAW OFFICES, LLP Travis W. Gerber, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8038 Zachary A. Gerber, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13128 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Anne R. Traum United States District Court Judge
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, WILLIAM HEINSELMAN (“Heinselman”), by and through its attorneys, Holland & Hart LLP, and Defendant/Counter-Claimant, DAVID GIBSON CONTRACTOR LLC (“Gibson”), by and through its attorneys, Gerber Law Offices, LLP, hereby stipulate the above-entitled action, including the claims by Heinselman against Gibson and the counterclaims by Gibson against Heinselman, is and shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.