From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinle v. Heinle

Supreme Court of Nevada
Nov 16, 1972
502 P.2d 986 (Nev. 1972)

Opinion

No. 6861

November 16, 1972

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; James J. Guinan, Judge.

Fry and Fry, of Reno, for Appellant.

Samuel B. Francovich, of Reno, for Respondent.


OPINION


In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we believe the trial court erred neither in its disposition of the parties' community property, NRS 125.150(1), nor in ordering appellant to pay respondent $75 per month for the support of the parties' minor daughter, NRS 125.140(2). Recounting those circumstances, which in combination are unique, would create no useful precedent.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Heinle v. Heinle

Supreme Court of Nevada
Nov 16, 1972
502 P.2d 986 (Nev. 1972)
Case details for

Heinle v. Heinle

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. HEINLE, APPELLANT, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Nov 16, 1972

Citations

502 P.2d 986 (Nev. 1972)
502 P.2d 986