From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heiniman v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 27, 1912
120 P. 1126 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)

Opinion

No. A-1267.

Opinion Filed January 27, 1912.

Appeal from Comanche County Court; James H. Wolverton, Judge.

L. Heiniman was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. Affirmed.

Hamon Ellis, for plaintiff in error.

E.G. Spillman and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Camanche county on the 1st day of March, 1911, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and thereafter on the 17th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred seventy-five dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No errors appearing from the record sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Heiniman v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 27, 1912
120 P. 1126 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
Case details for

Heiniman v. State

Case Details

Full title:L. HEINIMAN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 27, 1912

Citations

120 P. 1126 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
120 P. 1126