From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hein v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-03-2017

In the Matter of Richard HEIN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tina M. STANFORD, Chairperson, New York State Division of Parole, and Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondents–Respondents.

Richard Hein, Petitioner–Appellant Pro Se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Brian D. Ginsberg of Counsel), for respondents-respondents.


Richard Hein, Petitioner–Appellant Pro Se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Brian D. Ginsberg of Counsel), for respondents-respondents.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Sanchez v. Evans, 111 A.D.3d 1315, 974 N.Y.S.2d 832 ).

CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hein v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Hein v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Richard HEIN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Tina M. STANFORD…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 1359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 815
45 N.Y.S.3d 842