Heimbach v. Hill

Full title: JUSTIN C. HEIMBACH, Plaintiff, v. RONALD HILL, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 3, 2022

Civil Action 21-CV-3964 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-CV-3964

02-03-2022

JUSTIN C. HEIMBACH, Plaintiff, v. RONALD HILL, Defendant.

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2022, upon consideration of pro se Plaintiff C. Heimbach's Amended ComJpulsatint (ECF No. 7), it is ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add “Hill Enterprise” as a Defendant in this case in accordance with the caption of the Amended Complaint.

2. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum as follows:

a. Claims barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ;

b. Heimbach's remaining federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii); and

c. Heimbach's state law claims will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. Heimbach is not granted leave to file a second amended complaint in this matter.

4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.