From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heilman v. Wasko

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 18, 2013
2:12-cv-1966 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)

Opinion


THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Plaintiff, v. TODD WASKO, Defendant. No. 2:12-cv-1966 JAM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 18, 2013

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On September 13, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2013, are adopted in full; and

         2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is granted in part, dismissing the portion of plaintiff's claim alleging that defendant issued three retaliatory 128-B Chronos, and denied in part as to the portion of the claim alleging that defendant issued a retaliatory RVR dated October 28, 2011.


Summaries of

Heilman v. Wasko

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 18, 2013
2:12-cv-1966 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Heilman v. Wasko

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Plaintiff, v. TODD WASKO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-1966 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)