From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heidelberg v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 29, 2016
133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 26 WAP 2015

03-29-2016

Cal HEIDELBERG Jr., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwealth Court for further consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth Court's appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).


Summaries of

Heidelberg v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 29, 2016
133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Heidelberg v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:CAL HEIDELBERG JR., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 29, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Heidelberg v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

JOSEPH M. COSGROVE, Judge Heidelberg v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. and Parole (Pa., No. 26 WAP 2015, filed Mar. 29,…