From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heidelberg v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 26, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00018-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00018-BR-SPB

04-26-2017

CAL HEIDELBERG, JR., Petitioner, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter and receiving no objection from Petitioner, HEREBY ORDERS:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;

3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED;

4. This case is CLOSED; and

5. The clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: April 26, 2017

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Heidelberg v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 26, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00018-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Heidelberg v. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:CAL HEIDELBERG, JR., Petitioner, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00018-BR-SPB (W.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2017)