From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heidel v. Wallace Tiernan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 23, 1956
21 N.J. 335 (N.J. 1956)

Opinion

Argued March 26, 1956 —

Decided April 23, 1956.

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Solomon Golat argued the cause for the respondent ( Messrs. Talisman Golat, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Heidel v. Wallace Tiernan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 23, 1956
21 N.J. 335 (N.J. 1956)
Case details for

Heidel v. Wallace Tiernan

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HEIDEL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WALLACE TIERNAN…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 23, 1956

Citations

21 N.J. 335 (N.J. 1956)
122 A.2d 180

Citing Cases

DiCostanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.

The County Court disagreed, finding nothing in the statute or case decisions to permit a recovery of a…

Wright v. Purepac Corp.

This appeal by respondent followed. It is contended that the criterion for determining permanent disability…