From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 4, 2022
338 So. 3d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-0433

05-04-2022

Steven HEGGS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Steven Heggs, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Steven Heggs, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

Lewis, Bilbrey, and Long, JJ., concur


Summaries of

Heggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 4, 2022
338 So. 3d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Heggs v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven HEGGS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

338 So. 3d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)