From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heffelfinger v. Lane

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 7, 1940
194 So. 504 (Ala. 1940)

Opinion

7 Div. 610.

March 7, 1940.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; R. B. Carr, Judge.

Beddow, Ray Jones, of Birmingham, for appellant.

The appeal is taken pursuant to the statute. Code 1923, § 6431.

Knox, Dixon Dixon, of Talladega, for appellee.

The record disclosed no judgment of the trial court which will support an appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed ex mero motu. Davidson v. Stutts, 233 Ala. 491, 172 So. 600; Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187, 142 So. 572; Alston v. Marengo County Board, 224 Ala. 676, 141 So. 658; Temple v. Dooley, 196 Ala. 360, 71 So. 683; Martin v. Alabama Power Co., 208 Ala. 212, 94 So. 76; Lathrop Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber Co., 207 Ala. 522, 93 So. 427.


Action under our homicide statute (Section 5696, Code of 1923).

To the count for simple negligence (count 1) defendant interposed pleas 7, 8 and 10 of contributory negligence, and plaintiff's demurrers addressed thereto were overruled.

The record discloses the following: "On this the 13th day of November, 1939, came the parties by their attorneys and on account of the adverse ruling of the court upon the demurrers of the plaintiff, the pleas 7, 8 and 10 of the defendant, the plaintiff takes a non-suit with bill of exceptions."

The appeal is on the record with no bill of exceptions and the foregoing is all that is shown as to said non-suit. Appellee makes the point there is no final judgment which will support an appeal. Under the uniform decisions of this Court we must hold the point is well taken.

Under section 6431, Code of 1923, an appeal from a judgment of non-suit is authorized when necessitated by adverse rulings of the court. But there must be a final judgment disposing of the cause, "putting the case out of court," as expressed in Davison v. Stutts, 233 Ala. 491, 172 So. 600, a case here much in point. A number of authorities are to like effect.

The question is a jurisdictional one, and the court must dismiss the appeal ex mero motu. Davison v. Stutts, supra; Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187, 142 So. 572; Alston v. Marengo County Board, 224 Ala. 676, 141 So. 658; Temple v. Dooley, 196 Ala. 360, 71 So. 683; Lathrop Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber Co., 207 Ala. 522, 93 So. 427. It is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heffelfinger v. Lane

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 7, 1940
194 So. 504 (Ala. 1940)
Case details for

Heffelfinger v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:HEFFELFINGER v. LANE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 7, 1940

Citations

194 So. 504 (Ala. 1940)
194 So. 504

Citing Cases

Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama

To review ruling of trial court inducing non-suit, there must be a final judgment in proper form disposing of…

Vacalis v. Lowry

But the cases just cited have no application if the decree from which the appellants have sought to appeal is…