From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 8, 1929
21 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

Decided November 8, 1929.

Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.

PAUL PORTER and J. SMITH HAYS for appellant.

J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and SAMUEL B. KIRBY, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The transcript of evidence was filed in vacation. There is no order in the record showing its filing, or properly making it a part of the record. The motion to strike it from the record must be sustained. Maynard v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 362, 275 S.W. 871; Ford v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 677, 4 S.W.2d 683; Jones v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 273, 8 S.W.2d 382.

The appeal is denied, and the judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 8, 1929
21 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Nov 8, 1929

Citations

21 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1929)
21 S.W.2d 651

Citing Cases

Hiles v. Commonwealth

" Since there is no order of court filing the bill of exceptions and making it a part of the record, and…