Hedin v. Castillo

Full title: TERRY PAUL HEDIN, Plaintiff, v. JUAN D. CASTILLO, Regional Director…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 26, 2015

3:14-CV-01504-CL (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2015)

Opinion

3:14-CV-01504-CL

02-26-2015

TERRY PAUL HEDIN, Plaintiff, v. JUAN D. CASTILLO, Regional Director; MARION FEATHER, Warden FCI Sheridan; RICHARD KOWALCZYK, Head Chaplain FCI Sheridan; DANIEL WILLIAMS, Chaplain FCI Sheridan, Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued Findings and Recommendation (#19) on January 12, 2015, in which he recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003)(en banc).

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clark's Findings and Recommendation (#19) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26^th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge