From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgeye Risk Mgmt. v. Dale

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 8, 2022
21-CV-3687 (ALC) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-3687 (ALC) (RWL)

07-08-2022

HEDGEYE RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DARIUS DALE, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This order resolves Defendants' letter motion to compel non-party Sierpinski Capital Management, LP to produce and search for certain documents in response to the subpoena served on it by Defendants (Dkt. 272), and Sierpinski's letter motion to quash the subpoena (Dkt. 278). The motion to compel is granted to the extent that Sierpinski must carry out what it represents it will do in Dkt. 278 - that is, comply with requests 1 through 4, with request 2 limited as described by Hedgeye. Sierpinski shall also provide the sworn client statement requested by Defendants. Sierpinski's motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hedgeye Risk Mgmt. v. Dale

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 8, 2022
21-CV-3687 (ALC) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Hedgeye Risk Mgmt. v. Dale

Case Details

Full title:HEDGEYE RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DARIUS DALE, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 8, 2022

Citations

21-CV-3687 (ALC) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2022)