From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgespeth v. Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 28, 2012
Civil No. 11-5705 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-5705 (FSH)

08-28-2012

FREDERICK HEDGESPETH, Petitioner, v. CHARLES WARREN, et al., Respondents.


OPINION

IT APPEARING THAT: 1. On February 16, 2012, this Court ordered Petitioner to show cause in writing why his habeas petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. (Docket entry nos. 5, 6.) 2. Petitioner responded, but did not provide this Court any facts to indicate that the Petition was filed within the one-year limitations period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) or that the Petition can overcome the statutory time-bar due to equitable tolling. 3. The Petition appears to be time-barred. Accordingly, the Petition will be dismissed. The Court will enter an appropriate order and judgment.

______________

Faith S. Hochberg

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hedgespeth v. Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 28, 2012
Civil No. 11-5705 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Hedgespeth v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK HEDGESPETH, Petitioner, v. CHARLES WARREN, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-5705 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)