From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgespet v. Bartow

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
May 14, 2009
09-cv-246-slc (W.D. Wis. May. 14, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-246-slc.

May 14, 2009


ORDER


In response to an order entered in this case on April 23, 2009, plaintiff Raymond Hedgespeth has submitted a resident account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. From this statement, I conclude that plaintiff has the means to prepay a portion of the filing fee in the amount of $14.15. Plaintiff is reminded that paying the amount I have determined he is able to prepay is just the first step in obtaining leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. After the court receives plaintiff's payment, I will take his complaint under advisement for a determination under § 1915(e)(2) whether the action or any portion of it must be dismissed as frivolous or malicious, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted or because plaintiff seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff qualifies for pauper status on the condition that he prepay $14.15 of the $350 filing fee. He is to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in that amount on or before June 3, 2009. If by June 3, 2009, plaintiff fails to prepay the amount he has been ordered to pay, I will dismiss his case for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Hedgespet v. Bartow

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
May 14, 2009
09-cv-246-slc (W.D. Wis. May. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Hedgespet v. Bartow

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND K. HEDGESPETH, JR., Plaintiff, v. BYRON BARTOW and STEVE WATTERS…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: May 14, 2009

Citations

09-cv-246-slc (W.D. Wis. May. 14, 2009)