From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

April, 1915.


Without determining whether the amended complaint is sufficient in law, we think that plaintiff should be permitted to serve the same. As terms of the amendment, defendant is entitled to receive its full taxable costs and disbursements of the action to date. Whether the sum allowed ($100) is equal to these or not, we are not in a position to determine. Defendant may, at its election, either receive, as terms of the amendment, such taxable costs and disbursements, but without any extra allowance, or the sum allowed by the learned justice at Special Term. The order as thus modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works

Case Details

Full title:Dayton Hedges, Respondent, v. Pioneer Iron Works, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)