From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgecorth v. Mueller Machine Tool

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 14, 1996
922 S.W.2d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69207.

May 14, 1996.

APPEAL FROM LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

James A. Bingley, St. Louis, for appellant.

Christopher T. Archer, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


In this workers' compensation case, claimant appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision denying him compensation. He contends "there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to warrant the making of the award."

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hedgecorth v. Mueller Machine Tool

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 14, 1996
922 S.W.2d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Hedgecorth v. Mueller Machine Tool

Case Details

Full title:LOWELL STEVE HEDGECORTH, EMPLOYEE/APPELLANT, v. MUELLER MACHINE TOOL CO.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 14, 1996

Citations

922 S.W.2d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)