From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedge v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-07-00879-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-07-00879-CR

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, Trial Court No. 4673, Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding. AFFIRMED.

Sitting: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Shaun Matthew Hedge filed this appeal to challenge his conviction of fraudulent use of identifying information. On November 14, 2008, we abated the appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant still desired to prosecute his appeal and whether his counsel had abandoned the appeal. On December 31, 2008, this court adopted the trial court's findings that: (1) appellant absconded, indicating a desire not to prosecute his appeal; and (2) appellant's absconding precluded counsel from being able to prepare and file a brief. We further ordered the appeal to be submitted without briefs. In the interest of justice, we have reviewed the entire record but have found no unassigned fundamental error. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994). Accordingly, the trial court's judgment is affirmed. See id.


Summaries of

Hedge v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-07-00879-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Hedge v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shaun Matthew HEDGE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Mar 18, 2009

Citations

No. 04-07-00879-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)