From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgcoth v. Elwer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1328 JAM EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1328 JAM EFB PS

09-28-2011

WILLIAM JOSEPH HEDGCOTH, Plaintiff, v. KEN ELWER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 5, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 5, 2011, are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee of $350.00; and

4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to pay the required filing fee will result in a recommendation by the assigned magistrate judge that this action be dismissed.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hedgcoth v. Elwer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1328 JAM EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Hedgcoth v. Elwer

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JOSEPH HEDGCOTH, Plaintiff, v. KEN ELWER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1328 JAM EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)