From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heder v. City of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2019
Case No. LA CV14-08215 JAK (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV14-08215 JAK (JPRx)

10-15-2019

TYSON ZOLTAN HEDER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER, JOSHUA MEDINA (38401); OFFICER, LYNDON BARBER (40016); SERGEANT, RUDY BARILLAS (33713). Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment having been granted as to all of Plaintiff's claims, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Officer Joshua Medina #38401, Officer Lyndon Barber #40016, Sergeant Rudy Barillas #33713, and against Plaintiff, Tyson Zoltan Heder.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tyson Zoltan Heder shall recover nothing by reason of each and all of his claims as set forth in the Complaint against Defendants and that Defendants may recover their costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2019

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Heder v. City of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2019
Case No. LA CV14-08215 JAK (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Heder v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:TYSON ZOLTAN HEDER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2019

Citations

Case No. LA CV14-08215 JAK (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2019)