From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heddings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1986
484 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-1701.

March 4, 1986.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, David P. Kirwan, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Loren H. Cohen and Julian S. Mack, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michele L. Crawford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


We affirm the conviction for grand theft as appellant has failed to show reversible error. The circumstantial evidence pointed to appellant as the perpetrator of the offense to the reasonable exclusion of any other person. See Love v. State, 438 So.2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

We vacate the sentencing part of the judgment with instructions to the trial court to impose a sentence within the guideline range or to give written reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985).

Affirmed in part and remanded for further proceedings accordingly.


Summaries of

Heddings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1986
484 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Heddings v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY EDWARD HEDDINGS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 4, 1986

Citations

484 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Vigreaux v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development

I am satisfied that there are issues of material fact which would preclude a summary judgment, but the core…