Opinion
December 9, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the requested relief. Since a substantial portion of the revised damages amount was not revealed until defendants' New Jersey home was inspected in October 1992, and since the instant motion was filed within 3 months thereafter, plaintiff's delay in seeking relief was not inordinate. Moreover, we note that defendants have not controverted any of the specific amounts claimed by plaintiff or shown that they would be prejudiced if the requested relief were granted (see, Kushner v Queens Tr. Corp., 97 A.D.2d 432).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.