Opinion
Argued November 27, 1895
Decided December 19, 1895
William Lane O'Neill for appellant.
J. Noble Hayes for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hecla Consolidated Gold Mining Company v. O'Neill
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1895
42 N.E. 723 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Hecla Consolidated Gold Mining Company v. O'Neill
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1895
42 N.E. 723 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Hecla Consolidated Gold Mining Company v. O'Neill
Case Details
Full title:THE HECLA CONSOLIDATED GOLD MINING COMPANY, Respondent, v . WILLIAM LANE…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 19, 1895
Citations
42 N.E. 723 (N.Y. 1895)
42 N.E. 723
Citing Cases
Mann v. Commonwealth Bond Corporation
Thus by analogy, a reorganization committee is in the position of a promoter in respect of any moneys which…