From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heckel v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1947
273 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 8, 1947.


On call of the calendar and on consent of the parties, the order for defendant's examination before trial is modified in accordance with the signed stipulation of the parties, wherein defendant states that it has no one in its employ who has personal knowledge with respect to items 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said order, that it will produce no employee on the trial to testify to matters referred to in such items, and that it will promptly arrange with plaintiff for the immediate examination of any employee who has knowledge of such matters, in the event future investigation discloses the existence of such employee. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heckel v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1947
273 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Heckel v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:RUTH F. HECKEL et al., and PETER L. HECKEL, Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)