From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hecht v. Yarnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1944
268 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

June 28, 1944.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.;


The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. ( Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N.Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N.Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed.


Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]


Summaries of

Hecht v. Yarnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1944
268 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Hecht v. Yarnis

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR H. HECHT, Respondent, v. LILLIAN YARNIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Lang

Attempts to recover moneys or property received under, or as an incident of, an agreement to marry have…

Nosonowitz v. Kahn

However, the weight of the authorities now sustains a broader interpretation of the spirit and the public…