From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hecht v. Cardinal

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 21, 1931
140 So. 648 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion filed December 21, 1931.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.

Ira C. Haycock, for Appellant;

Paul C. Taylor, for Appellees.


This was a suit to cancel a tax deed. General and special demurrers were filed attacking a second amended bill of complaint. The demurrers were overruled, from which order appealed was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Tax Securities Corporation, a Florida Corporation vs. Peggie Borland, et al., opinion filed at this term of Court. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


The object of the bill, and its prayer, is to cancel the tax deed, not the liability of the land to the tax attempted to be assessed. This deed, if all statutory steps have been followed, conveys title in itself, but if not, it as a deed may be decreed to be invalid and the holder of it remitted to his appropriate remedy under Sec. 1026 C. G. L., 795, R. G. S. See San Sebastian Development Corp. vs. Couch, decided at the present term, and the case cited in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice BUFORD above.


Summaries of

Hecht v. Cardinal

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 21, 1931
140 So. 648 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Hecht v. Cardinal

Case Details

Full title:HARRY W. HECHT, Appellant, vs. RUTH T. CARDINAL, joined by her husband and…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: Dec 21, 1931

Citations

140 So. 648 (Fla. 1931)
140 So. 648

Citing Cases

Overstreet v. Gordon

Under the law in effect prior to the effective date of Chapter 14572, Acts 1929, failure to properly…

Hecht v. Shaw

61 C. J. 1258. See also Tax Securities Corporation v. Borland, 103 Fla. 63, 137 So.2d 151; Hecht v. Cardinal,…