Opinion
No. 09-09-00500-CR
Submitted on April 7, 2010.
Opinion Delivered April 21, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 07-01079. Affirmed.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Brandi Nicole Hebert a/k/a Brandi Nicole Dakota a/k/a Brandi Nicole Petitjean pled guilty to aggravated robbery. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Hebert guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Hebert on community supervision for ten years, and assessed a fine of $1,000. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Hebert's unadjudicated community supervision. Hebert pled "true" to one violation of the conditions of her community supervision. The trial court found that Hebert violated the conditions of her community supervision, found Hebert guilty of aggravated robbery, and assessed punishment at twenty years of confinement. Hebert's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On December 31, 2009, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.
Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.