From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hebert v. Royal Enter. of Pensacola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 14, 1972
259 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. N-484.

March 14, 1972. Rehearing Denied April 14, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Ernest E. Mason, J.

A.G. Condon, Jr., of Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard, Mitchell Condon, Pensacola, for appellants.

Richard H. Merritt, Pensacola, for appellees.


This appeal is from a final judgment dismissing appellants-plaintiffs' complaint against appellees which sought to dissolve the corporation known as Royal Enterprises of Pensacola, Inc.

The trial court, sitting without a jury, specifically found, after hearing argument of counsel and considering the written briefs of the parties, that plaintiffs failed by a fair preponderance of the evidence to establish their cause of action against appellees to have the above-named corporation dissolved either under the provisions of § 608.28, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., or under any principle of equity. We agree.

The record and transcript herein clearly supports the trial court's conclusions that said § 608.28 is inapplicable because the total stock voting power was not evenly divided into two independent ownerships or interests. Appellee-Miller owned 51% of the voting stock. The record further supports the finding that plaintiffs failed to show any fraud or mismanagement on the part of the appellees.

Our consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and oral argument leads us to conclude that appellants have failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed herein is erroneous. Said judgment is therefore affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C.J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Hebert v. Royal Enter. of Pensacola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 14, 1972
259 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Hebert v. Royal Enter. of Pensacola

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL J. HEBERT AND PHILIP J. LEVINE, APPELLANTS, v. ROYAL ENTERPRISES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 14, 1972

Citations

259 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Bartlett v. Caines

As such, the trial court had no authority to order the partition of the corporate real estate and personalty…