From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hebert v. Hebert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 14, 1989

Appeal from the Onondaga County Family Court, McLaughlin, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Onondaga County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order entered in this support proceeding in Family Court must be reversed because the record does not establish that respondent was advised of his right to be represented by counsel at the hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 433 [a]). The Hearing Examiner's question to respondent concerning whether he intended to get an attorney was insufficient to advise respondent that he had an absolute right to be represented by counsel at the hearing at his own expense, and that he was entitled to an adjournment for the purpose of retaining the services of an attorney (cf., Matter of Krieger v Krieger, 43 A.D.2d 954).


Summaries of

Hebert v. Hebert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Hebert v. Hebert

Case Details

Full title:SHERRY L. HEBERT, Respondent, v. DANIEL R. HEBERT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 82

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Moore-Shepherd

" When the parties answered that they would be speaking for themselves, the court proceeded without further…

Lada v. Lada

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court's failure to advise him of the right to retain counsel…