Heaton v. State

Full title: Thomas Chad Heaton, Respondent, v. State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2011-205087 (S.C. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-205087 Memorandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-020

06-12-2013

Thomas Chad Heaton, Respondent, v. State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, for Petitioner. Ricky K. Harris, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Anderson County

John C. Hayes, III, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Ricky K. Harris, of Spartanburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Heaton v. State, Op. No. 2011-UP-456 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Oct. 13, 2011), affirming the grant of Respondent's post-conviction relief (PCR) application. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.