From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heath v. Murillo

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 26, 2024
1:24-CV-03121-MKD (E.D. Wash. Nov. 26, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-CV-03121-MKD

11-26-2024

TYSON J. HEATH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. NATE MURILLO, an individual; BRANDON JAMES WOLCOTT, an individual; AUSTEN SCOTT CAGLE, an individual; RYAN L. YATES, an individual; SERGIO MARQUEZ, an individual; DOMINIC DANNAN, an individual; CITY OF YAKIMA, a government municipality; and DOES 1-X AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1X, Defendants.


ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ECF No. 16

MARY K. DIMKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulated Motion for Dismissal, ECF No. 16. The parties stipulate to the dismissal of this action, with prejudice and without an award of attorneys' fees or costs to any party. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. The stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The parties' Stipulated Motion for Dismissal, ECF No. 16, is GRANTED.

2. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties' stipulation, all claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, without an award of fees or costs.

3. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot.

4. All pending dates and deadlines are STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, provide copies to the parties, and CLOSE the file.


Summaries of

Heath v. Murillo

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 26, 2024
1:24-CV-03121-MKD (E.D. Wash. Nov. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Heath v. Murillo

Case Details

Full title:TYSON J. HEATH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. NATE MURILLO, an individual…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Date published: Nov 26, 2024

Citations

1:24-CV-03121-MKD (E.D. Wash. Nov. 26, 2024)