From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heath v. Grant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 10, 2020
Case No. CIV-20-569-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-20-569-G

11-10-2020

DAVID WAYNE HEATH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GRANT, FCI, EL RENO, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner David Wayne Heath, a federal prisoner, filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging a disciplinary conviction. See Pet. (Doc. No. 1). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for preliminary review.

On September 15, 2020, Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16), in which he recommended the habeas petition be denied. In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Purcell advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by October 5, 2020. Judge Purcell also advised that a failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appellate review of the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation.

As of this date, no party has submitted an objection to the Report and Recommendation or sought leave for additional time to do so.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is ADOPTED in its entirety. The habeas corpus petition is DENIED. A separate judgment shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

CHARLES B. GOODWIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Heath v. Grant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 10, 2020
Case No. CIV-20-569-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Heath v. Grant

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAYNE HEATH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GRANT, FCI, EL RENO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

Case No. CIV-20-569-G (W.D. Okla. Nov. 10, 2020)