From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearring v. Reubart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
3:22-cv-00377-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00377-LRH-CSD

10-31-2022

FRANK HEARRING, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM REUBART, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Frank Hearring's motion to extend time. (ECF No. 6.) On September 19, 2022, this Court ordered Petitioner to file a “Response to Order to Show Cause” on or before October 17, 2022, showing cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for a lack of jurisdiction based on the Petition being second or successive. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner requests an additional 60 days to file his “Response to Order to Show Cause” because he is currently preparing discovery in a different case. (ECF No. 6.) Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to extend time (ECF No. 6) is granted. Petitioner has until on or before December 16, 2022, to file his “Response to Order to Show Cause.”


Summaries of

Hearring v. Reubart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2022
3:22-cv-00377-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Hearring v. Reubart

Case Details

Full title:FRANK HEARRING, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM REUBART, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00377-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2022)