From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearne v. Farhat

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P

06-01-2021

JOHN HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 26, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 26, 2021, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 25) is denied.


Summaries of

Hearne v. Farhat

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Hearne v. Farhat

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)