From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearne v. Bravo Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2022
2:22-cv-00531-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00531-MCE-DB

11-14-2022

MARCELL HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. BRAVO SECURITY SERVICES, INC.; FURQAN KHALIQ, and NUMAAN KHALIQ, DOES 1 to 50, Defendants.

George F. Allen, Attorney for Plaintiff Marcell Hearne Thomas F. Nowland Daniel A. Brodnax LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS F. NOWLAND Attorneys for Defendants BRAVO SECURITY SERVICES, INC., FURQAN KHALIQ, and NUMAAN KHALIQ


George F. Allen, Attorney for Plaintiff Marcell Hearne

Thomas F. Nowland Daniel A. Brodnax LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS F. NOWLAND Attorneys for Defendants BRAVO SECURITY SERVICES, INC., FURQAN KHALIQ, and NUMAAN KHALIQ

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PLAINTIFF Marcell Hearne and Defendants Bravo Security Services, Inc., Furqan Khaliq, and Numaan Khaliq have resolved their dispute and now jointly move to dismiss the above-styled action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

All parties shall bear their respective fees, costs, and expenses.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hearne v. Bravo Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2022
2:22-cv-00531-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Hearne v. Bravo Sec. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:MARCELL HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. BRAVO SECURITY SERVICES, INC.; FURQAN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00531-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2022)