From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 11, 1994
631 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-886.

February 11, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County; Arthur W. Nichols, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dan Haun, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concurs.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.


The trial court ordered appellant to pay $100 "law enforcement investigative costs" to the sheriff's department. Appellant cites Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) as authority to urge reversal of the order and appellee has not addressed the specific point raised. Without some showing of the reasonableness, or the relevance, or the applicability, or the legal authority for this assessment the court should not impose it.

I would quash that order.


Summaries of

Hearn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 11, 1994
631 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Hearn v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK W. HEARN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 11, 1994

Citations

631 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)