From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0174 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0174 SECTION P

03-06-2020

DOUGLAS FRANKLIN HEARD v. SHERIFF J. RUSSELL, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 4] of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the Objection [Doc. No. 5] thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Douglas Franklin Heard's claims are DISMISSED as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. The claims are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to raise them before a state court. The claims are otherwise dismissed with prejudice.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 6th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Heard v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0174 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Heard v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS FRANKLIN HEARD v. SHERIFF J. RUSSELL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0174 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)