From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. Mexicans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 12, 2019
Civil Action No. 19-2202 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 12, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-2202 (UNA)

08-12-2019

ROBERT HEARD, Plaintiff, v. MEXICANS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). This complaint sets forth no actual legal claim. Rather, it reads as the plaintiff's observations and musings following the death of a deputy sheriff with whom he was acquainted. The Court, therefore, will dismiss the complaint without prejudice because it fails to comply with Rule 8(a).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: August 12, 2019

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Heard v. Mexicans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 12, 2019
Civil Action No. 19-2202 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Heard v. Mexicans

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HEARD, Plaintiff, v. MEXICANS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-2202 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 12, 2019)