From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. Jones

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 1, 2008
No. 3:07-0738 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 1, 2008)

Opinion

No. 3:07-0738.

February 1, 2008


ORDER


On July 12, 2007, an Order (Docket Entry No. 7) was entered dismissing the instant pro se prisoner action as frivolous. Since the entry of this Order, the plaintiff has filed a Motion to Reconsider (Docket Entry No. 13) the dismissal.

A motion to reconsider is treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. McDowell v. Dynamics Corporation of America, 931 F.2d 380, 382 (6th Cir. 1991). Rule 59(e) provides that a motion to alter or amend judgment "shall be filed no later than 10 days after entry of the judgment." The plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment was filed on November 16, 2007, well beyond the expiration of the 10 day period. Rule 6(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is untimely and is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Heard v. Jones

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 1, 2008
No. 3:07-0738 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Heard v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY HEARD Plaintiff, v. TRUMAN JONES, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

No. 3:07-0738 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 1, 2008)