From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. Fortner

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 25, 2011
No. 3:09-1144 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:09-1144.

January 25, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Entry No. 39) to which Petitioner has filed timely objections (Docket Entry No. 42). Upon de novo review of the Report and Recommendation and after considering Petitioner's objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the Petitioner's motion for partial judgment (Docket Entry No. 23) and motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 26) are DENIED. Petitioner's petition for the writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's unexhausted claim on the attempted murder count.

It is so ORDERED. ENTERED this the 24th day of January, 2011.


Summaries of

Heard v. Fortner

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 25, 2011
No. 3:09-1144 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Heard v. Fortner

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY HEARD, Petitioner, v. JAMES FORTNER, WARDEN Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

Citations

No. 3:09-1144 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

Heard v. McAllister

The district court adopted the recommendation in its entirety and dismissed the petition "without prejudice…