From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heaney v. Costigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB

07-27-2012

JOHN STEPHEN HEANEY, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE JAMES COSTIGAN, DETECTIVE MICHAEL CORDOVA, DETECTIVE NOEL IKEDA, SERGEANT DANIEL STEELE, and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

I am informed that this matter has been resolved by the parties. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs [Doc. # 177, filed 6/13/2012] is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Heaney v. Costigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Heaney v. Costigan

Case Details

Full title:JOHN STEPHEN HEANEY, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE JAMES COSTIGAN, DETECTIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2012)