From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Yasmeen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:19-CV-2052-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-CV-2052-WBS-DMC-P

09-28-2021

JEFF HEALY, Plaintiff, v. SHAGUFTA YASMEEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 40, for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's June 23, 2021, order.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The June 23, 2021, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 40, is denied;

2. The Magistrate Judge's June 23, 2021, order is affirmed; and

3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.


Summaries of

Healy v. Yasmeen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:19-CV-2052-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Healy v. Yasmeen

Case Details

Full title:JEFF HEALY, Plaintiff, v. SHAGUFTA YASMEEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:19-CV-2052-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)