From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. H.K. Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 447 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

June 19, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, PELHAM ST. GEORGE BISSELL, 3D, J.

Richard E. Bauman for appellant.

Elliott A. Ferber for respondent.


A motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 is unavailable to the petitioner tenant in this summary proceeding. The statutory remedy may be utilized by a plaintiff or by a petitioner movant only if the cause of action falls within one of the nine subdivisions of the rule. ( Feyh v. Brandtgen Kluge, 283 App. Div. 807).

The final order in favor of the petitioner tenant should be reversed, with $10 costs to the appellant landlord, and motion for summary judgment denied.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied, without costs.

HOFSTADTER, J.P., and TILZER, J., concur; HECHT, J., concurs in result.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Healy v. H.K. Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 447 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Healy v. H.K. Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SUE HEALY, Respondent, v. H.K. REALTY CORP., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1958

Citations

13 Misc. 2d 447 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
176 N.Y.S.2d 798

Citing Cases

Hecht v. Maness

Per Curiam. A summary proceeding to recover possession of real property is not an action within the purview…