From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Fuston

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 4, 2012
No. 05-11-01399-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 05-11-01399-CV

10-04-2012

DEBRA KAY HEALY, Appellant v. ROBERT FUSTON, Appellee


DISMISS;

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-1950-2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers

On October 13, 2011, appellant Debra Kay Healy filed a notice of appeal in this case. On March 15, 2012, we notified appellant that the brief she tendered was defective, and, if she did not file an amended brief within ten days, the appeal could be dismissed. Despite being granted an extension to file the amended brief, appellant has failed to do so. On August 12, 2012, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant has not replied to the motion to dismiss or otherwise communicated with this Court regarding her appeal.

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

111399F.P05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DEBRA KAY HEALY, Appellant

V.

ROBERT FUSTON, Appellee

No. 05-11-01399-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 of Collin County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 006- 1950-2011).

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices O'Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Appellee is ORDERED to recover his costs of this appeal from appellant.

Judgment entered October 4, 2012.

KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Healy v. Fuston

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 4, 2012
No. 05-11-01399-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Healy v. Fuston

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA KAY HEALY, Appellant v. ROBERT FUSTON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 4, 2012

Citations

No. 05-11-01399-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2012)