From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Empire Trust Company, Shoenholz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1950
301 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1950

Decided July 11, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, PECORA, J.

A. Hayne de Yampert, Walter F. Burke, Jr., Edward T. Pierce, Wilberforce Sully, Jr., Raymond A. Tierney, George N. Whittlesey, Williston Benedict, Malcolm G. Spooner, David G. Ashton, Robert A. West, Charles F. Hopkins and John E. Mack for Home for Old Men and Aged Couples and others, appellants.

Milton Schilback and E. Williams Holmes for Thomas M. Healy, respondent.

Milton Schilback for Jacob T. Shoenholz, respondent.

William L. Woodward for Empire Trust Company, defendant.


Judgment affirmed, with costs to each party, or group of parties, filing separate briefs payable from the four trusts in the proportions fixed by the judgment of the Appellate Division. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Healy v. Empire Trust Company, Shoenholz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1950
301 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Healy v. Empire Trust Company, Shoenholz

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS M. HEALY, as Executor of MARY K. STEVENS, Deceased, Respondent, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1950

Citations

301 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1950)
93 N.E.2d 914

Citing Cases

Matter of Ross

The rule had become so crystalized by 1885 that Judge DANFORTH in Matter of Mahan (98 N.Y. 372, 376) remarked…

Werbelovsky v. Manufacturers Trust Company

In any event, the first cause of action to terminate the trust is insufficient because it is based on the…