From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Dentcare Delivery Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1987
129 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 6, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents Dentcare Delivery Systems, Inc., Donovan and Feinberg.

In view of the fact that a pending action existed between the same parties for essentially the same relief and involving the same actionable wrong (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [4]; Siegel, N Y Prac § 262), Special Term did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint herein. Mollen, P.J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Healy v. Dentcare Delivery Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1987
129 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Healy v. Dentcare Delivery Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN HEALY et al., Appellants, v. DENTCARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

GSL Enterprises, Inc. v. Citibank

The instant complaint was properly dismissed because "a pending action existed between the same parties for…