Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01633-WYD-BNB.
November 7, 2011
ORDER
This matter arises on the following:
(1) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Discovery [Doc. # 117, filed 10/13/2011] (the "Motion for Discovery");
(2) Defendant's Motion for Stay of Plaintiff's Optum-Related Discovery Pending Appeal to the District Judge [Doc. # 121, filed 10/22/2011] (the "Motion to Stay"); and
(3) Motion for Leave to Submit a Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Discovery [Doc. # 132, filed 11/2/2011] (the "Motion to Reply").
I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion for Discovery [Doc. # 117] is GRANTED;
(2) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 121] is DENIED; and
(3) The Motion to Reply [Doc. # 132] is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing Defendant's Reply [Doc. # 132-1].