From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Health Welfare Plan v. Ridler

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 10, 1997
124 F.3d 207 (8th Cir. 1997)

Summary

holding that a petitioner's § 2255 motion filed after a prior motion had been dismissed without prejudice did not qualify as “second or successive”

Summary of this case from United States v. Sellner

Opinion

No. 96-4031.

September 10, 1997.

D.Minn., 942 F.Supp. 431.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

The following cases have been decided without published opinion, pursuant to the "Plan of Publication of Opinions" adopted by the Judicial Council of the Eighth Circuit on January 11, 1973, and effective that date:

Affirmed


Summaries of

Health Welfare Plan v. Ridler

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 10, 1997
124 F.3d 207 (8th Cir. 1997)

holding that a petitioner's § 2255 motion filed after a prior motion had been dismissed without prejudice did not qualify as “second or successive”

Summary of this case from United States v. Sellner

holding that 135 days in disciplinary segregation and administrative segregation was not an atypical and significant hardship

Summary of this case from Warren v. Seabaugh

finding that 135 days in disciplinary and administrative segregation without "meaningful exercise, natural light, and adequate time in the library" did not alone constitute an "atypical and significant hardship"

Summary of this case from Halfacre v. Ark. Bd. of Corr.

finding that of 135 days in disciplinary and administrative segregation without "meaningful exercise, natural light, and adequate time in the library" did not alone constitute an "atypical and significant hardship"

Summary of this case from Gilliam v. Burl
Case details for

Health Welfare Plan v. Ridler

Case Details

Full title:Health and Welfare Plan for Employees of REM, Inc. v. Ridler

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 1997

Citations

124 F.3d 207 (8th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Warren v. Seabaugh

Plaintiff has failed to allege specific facts indicating how the termination of this…

Williams v. Milam

Plaintiff's allegations do not indicate that he has suffered the type of atypical and significant hardship in…