Opinion
No. 3D21-2010
06-15-2022
Carlton Fields, P.A., and Dean A. Morande (West Palm Beach) and Roger S. Kobert, for appellant. Fowler White Burnett, P.A., and Dino G. Galardi, for appellee.
Carlton Fields, P.A., and Dean A. Morande (West Palm Beach) and Roger S. Kobert, for appellant.
Fowler White Burnett, P.A., and Dino G. Galardi, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Operis Grp., Corp. v. E.I. at Doral, LLC, 973 So. 2d 485, 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (confirming that a challenge to the validity of an arbitration agreement, based on the making of and existence of a written agreement between the parties, is to be resolved by the trial court). See also CT Miami, LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Latinoamerica Miami, Inc., 201 So. 3d 85, 92–93 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that challenges to either party's agreement to the contract in the first instance, including those that allege that a subsequent contract superseded and invalidated a prior contract containing an arbitration provision, are exclusively to be determined by the trial court).